Protection of
Well-known Marks
Well-known trade and service marks enjoy in most countries protection
against signs which are considered a reproduction, imitation or translation of
that mark provided that they are likely to cause confusion in the relevant
sector of the public. Well-known marks are usually protected, irrespective of
whether they are registered or not, in respect of goods and services which are
identical with, or similar to, those for which they have gained their
reputation. In many countries, they are also, under certain conditions protected
for dissimilar goods and services. It should be noted that, while there is no
commonly agreed detailed definition of what constitutes a “well-known mark,”
countries may take advantage of the 'WIPO Joint Recommendations on the
Protection of Well-Known Marks.'
Many countries protect unregistered well-known
marks in accordance with their international obligations under the Paris
Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property and the Agreement on
Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (the TRIPS Agreement).
Consequently, not only big companies but also
SMEs may have a good
chance of establishing enough goodwill with
customers so that their marks may be
recognized as well-known marks and acquire protection without registration. It
is, nevertheless, advisable to seek registration, taking into account that many
countries provide for an extended protection of registered well-known marks
against dilution (Art. 16.3 TRIPS), i.e., the reputation of the mark being
weakened by the unauthorized use of that mark by others.
You should be aware of the fact that a number of
trademark laws merely implement obligations under Article 16.3. of the TRIPS
Agreement and protect well-known registered trademarks only under the following
conditions:
▪ that the goods and services for which the other
mark is used or is seeking protection are not identical with or similar to the
goods for which the well-known mark acquired its reputation
▪ that the use of the other mark would indicate a
connection between these goods and the owner of the
well-known mark, and
▪ that his interests are likely to be damaged by
such use.
|