Framework
of the BP Knowledge
Management Methodology
|
❶
A
learning cycle – before, during and after any event – supported by
simple process tools
❷ The
lessons arising from the learning loop are agreed and distilled by a
community of practice – peers across the organization who have a
stake in agreeing and defining BP's best practice.
❸
The lessons – both specific and generic are incorporated into
"Knowledge Assets" on the corporate intranet, where they represent a
living focus for BP's experience around strategic and operational
areas.
|
Action Plan for Competitive Learning
developed by John
Browne, former CEO, British Petroleum |
Anyone in the company who is not directly
accountable for making a
profit shall be involved in creating and
distributing knowledge that the
company can use to
→
make a profit
Our philosophy is simple: Every time we do something, we should try to
do it
→
better than the last time
No matter where the knowledge come from, the key to reaping a big
return is to leverage that knowledge by replicating it throughout
the company so that each unit is not learning in isolation and
reinventing the wheel
We must view relationships as a
coming together that allows us to do
something no other two parties can do, and that is make the pie
bigger, to our mutual advantage
|
Dual Citizenship
|
The need to share and learn drives staff
towards dual citizenship:
❶ affiliated both to the
business unit, and also
❷
committed to a knowledge network of peers across the business
units. |
|
|
Co-evolving
with
Internal and External Players
|
Internally,
the organization co-evolves with each business unit, department and
function.
Externally,
the organization
co-evolves with its customers and suppliers. |
|
Global Leader in Knowledge
Management (KM)
British Petroleum has a worldwide reputation
for commitment to
knowledge management (KM).
The
knowledge
management methodology pioneered in
BP's is
encompassed by a simple framework, which describes a learning cycle –
before, during and after any event – which is supported by simple process
tools.
The lessons arising from that learning loop are agreed and distilled
by a community of practice.
Finally, the lessons – both specific and generic
are incorporated into "Knowledge Assets" on the corporate intranet.
Benefits
The business benefits of applying a consistent approach to knowledge
management have been significant. BP business managers attributed hundreds
of millions of dollars of added value as a direct result of using this
approach.
A practical example of this has been in the
cost reduction in the construction of European retail sites:
At the beginning of 1998 a challenge is set of
reducing the build costs of retail sites in Europe by 10%. The Alliance (a
joint venture between BP and Bovis) is responsible for the management of
these activities in Europe. The Alliance was engaged in the benefits of
knowledge management and invited the BP KM Team to help them achieve this
outcome. Step change in costs was delivered in 1998 (savings of $74 million)
due to the harvesting and sharing of knowledge between the project engineers
in Europe. This gave BP Downstream Retail competitive advantage in the
Mature European Marketplace. This knowledge is now also being leveraged on a
global scale by project engineers in Venezuela, China, Poland, and Japan.
Source: "KM & British
Petroleum", SAIC
Similar examples of increased performance have
come from BP's KM application in speeding up business restructuring,
developing new oil & gas fields, improving plant productivity and
accelerating new retail market entry.
|
|
The Role of
Top Leaderships
John Browne, former
CEO
of British Petroleum is an outspoken enthusiast of the power of
corporate
learning. From his perspective, learning provides the catalyst and the
intellectual resource to create a
competitive advantage. "In order to
generate extraordinary value for shareholders, a company has to learn better
than its competitors and apply that knowledge throughout its businesses
faster and more widely than they do. The way we see it, anyone in the
organization who is not directly accountable for making a profit should be
involved in creating and distributing knowledge that the company can use to
make a profit," says John Browne.
Browne has developed
an action plan for competitive corporate learning
to spur changes in people's
attitudes and ultimately formal
and informal rules that govern the organization's behavior. "The wonderful thing about knowledge is that it
is relatively inexpensive to replicate if you can capture it. Most
activities or tasks are not onetime events. Whether it's drilling a well or
conducting a transaction at a service station, we do the same things
repeatedly. Our philosophy is fairly simple: Every time we do something
again, we should do it better than the last time," says John Browne.
Virtual
Teamwork Project
BP Exploration (BPX)
was
reorganized into 42 separate business units. Then, BP launched the
Virtual
Teamwork Project (VTP), its first major KM initiative. The aim of VTP
was to encourage the sharing of knowledge and to motivate the business units
to utilize IT tools to improve their business. The VTP was designed to
enable employees to share task-specific knowledge and develop partnership
relationships with the employees of other units. Later the company launched a series of KM initiatives, which
yielded excellent financial results for its business operations. Following
the successful implementation of VTP, BP launched various KM tools such as
Peer Assist, After Action Review, BP Connect, Retrospect and Human portal.
Knowledge Management Team (KMT)
BP became one of the first few companies to
treat KM as a separate discipline when it established a Knowledge Management
Team (KMT) in 1997. John Browne,
British Petroleum's has a personal interest in the subject, and established
KMT to champion and harness the benefits of organizational learning both
within and across its
flattened hierarchy.
Peer
Groups
In order to integrate the efforts of the
business units engaged in the same business activities, they were organized
into peer groups. They met periodically to discuss the performance of their
businesses.
|
|
The purpose of the reorganization was to
facilitate knowledge sharing and
→
build synergies,
i.e. to exchange knowledge and
synergize
→
creative capabilities and expertise of the employees working in different
business units of BP.
Enhancing Organizational
Capability
To enhance
→
organizational capability, BP
reduced or removed central functions, and
business units were empowered to chose their own
routes to implement changes. A flat
organization was established. The number of management levels was
reduced from 13 to 5...
More
|